That is imagined to be the "drop by" powder-or darn close to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It really is the muse for numerous pet loads, yet I have not been happy with the final results.
Not surprisingly, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different lot figures, but I do think I understand why. It is a litigation-driven earth, and some fool would definitely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his very own personalized blend of powder. What a planet.
It really is likely that no additional discussion is required, in which scenario we endorse starting off a new thread. If even so you really feel your response is required it is possible to however accomplish that.
Sweet!! I will choose some up and give it a test. Thank you fellas, I respect it! I will let you determine what I learn. I do have a few half pound of 4350 I'm able to attempt that initial and see what takes place.
Yup or it will never perform well. And since the OP incorporates a load applying Varget I'd try to discover someone to trade with. Could possibly come up with a gain win problem.
I know, tough situations. H4831SC will certainly get the job done, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded extensive. I do not recall powder cost off the highest of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which is where I usually purpose being. Inside your circumstance employing what you may have (and what I must have carried out) I would get started with the tip from the bearing area with the bullet right within the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with h4831sc load data extending seating depths from there when you finally discover a velocity node.
Confirm YOUR AGE Particular states prohibit advertising or advertising of firearms, ammunition, and associated firearm parts to minors. We’d like to make certain that you’re eighteen decades of age or more mature right before enabling you to shop our web-site. Are you eighteen years of age or more mature?
Like reported earlier mentioned, identical things. All of that is different is the size with the kernels. I did hear someplace that they are going to only make the SC Down the road. I have no idea if that is genuine or not but would make sense to me. I exploit SC since that is what I present in the eight lb jug and it works.
dioni.a.312 said: In my working experience the only true difference is that the shortcut meters superior through reloading equipment. After It really is loaded theres no practical big difference. I've read which the shortcut might have a very small little bit speedier burn off rate but It appears insignificant. Click on to increase...
It is funny how over time loading plenty of unique cartridges in numerous rifles that I have never obtained acceptable end results with H-4831 or maybe the limited-Lower version.
Validate YOUR AGE Specific states prohibit promotion or advertising and marketing of firearms, ammunition, and similar firearm components to minors. We’d like making sure that you’re eighteen decades of age or older just before letting you to buy our website. Do you think you're eighteen yrs of age or more mature?
Yes, You need to use the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, nevertheless the SC Model may h4831sc perhaps permit you to get a tad extra in circumstances where you are maxing out situation volume Along with the standard powder prior to reaching strain boundaries.
Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are different powders, you will see that in lots of circumstances, the place one of these is listed another is going to be also. Also, you will find there is a fairly dependable marriage in between them with reference to shown loads.
This looks like a good location to disclose a bit more facts on Hodgdon, H4831 especially...I the moment had a pound of H4831SC sit about the shelf for a number of several h4831sc load data years. It absolutely was bought in advance of Hodgdon began publicizing the "Severe" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.